Wake-up Call

Resist the Corporate State

European Swine Flu Vaccines contain Nano-particles

with 5 comments

nanoparticlesCan ours be far behind?  New cell-line technologies and vaccine additives also remain largely untested. The Pharma Industry is willing to risk millions of lives for profit. 

What has happened to the integrity of Science?? Co-opted, corrupted and no longer to be trusted.

 

Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines

Part III: ‘It’s the vaccines, Stupid! 

By F. William Engdahl   Global Research, September 13, 2009

Vaccines which have been approved by the responsible government authorities for vaccination against the alleged H1N1 Influenza A Swine Flu have been found to contain nano particles. Vaccine makers have been experimenting with nanoparticles as a way to “turbo charge” vaccines for several years. Now it has come out that the vaccines approved for use in Germany and other European countries contain nanoparticles in a form that reportedly attacks healthy cells and can be deadly.

In 2007 researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) announced in an article in the journal, Nature Biotechnology, that they had developed  a “nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines more effectively, with fewer side effects, and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies.” The article went on to describe the effects of their breakthrough: “At a mere 25 nanometers, these particles are so tiny that once injected, they flow through the skin’s extracellular matrix, making a beeline to the lymph nodes. Within minutes, they’ve reached a concentration of DCs thousands of times greater than in the skin. The immune response can then be extremely strong and effective.” 1

There is only one small problem with vaccines containing nanoparticles—they can be deadly and at the least cause severe irreparable health damage.

Nanoparticles, promoted in the mass media as the new wonder revolution of science, are particles that have been produced vastly smaller than deadly asbestos particles which caused severe lung damage and death before being outlawed. Particles at a nano size, (nm = 0,000000001 Meter) fuse together with the membranes of our body cell membranes and, according to recent studies in China and Japan, continuously destroy cells once introduced into the body. Once they interact with the body’s cellular structure, they cannot be removed. Modern medicine euphemistically terms the phenomenon, a continuing infectious reaction.

Since the asbestos scandal, it has been established that particles in size a millionth of a meter, because of their enormous attractive force, penetrate all cells, destroying all those they come into contact with. Nanoparticles are far smaller than asbestos fibers.

Beijing Tests confirm deadly effects on humans

The fact that WHO, the European Medicines Evaluation Agency, the German Robert Koch Institute and other health bodies today would permit the population to be injected with largely untested novel vaccines containing nanoparticles says more about the powerful pharma lobby in European politics than it does about the sanity or moral integrity of the civil servants responsible for health of the general public.

The September 2009 issue of the respected European Respiratory Journal, made public on 19 August, and available since 21 August online, contains a peer-reviewed article with the title, “Exposure to nanoparticles is related to pleural effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma.”

The article describes tests carried out in 2008 at the elite Beijing Chaoyang Hospital on seven young women. All seven, ages 18-47 had been exposed to nanoparticles for 5–13 months in their common workplace. All were admitted to the hospital with shortness of breath and pleural effusions, or excessive fluids surrounding the lungs, inhibiting breathing. None of the seven had ever smoked and none were in any special risk group. Doctors carefully tested for every possibility and confirmed that the lung problems had a common origin—regular inhalation of nanoparticles in their factory. They had been exposed to Polyacrylat nanoparticles.

The tests confirmed the nanoparticles had set off a “super-meltdown” reaction in the patients. Despite all heroic efforts of doctors, two of the seven died from the lung complications. 2

In their report, the scientists concluded something so alarming it is necessary to quote at length:

Immunological tests, examinations of bacteriology, virology and tumour markers, bronchoscopy, internal thoracoscopy and video-assisted thoracic surgery were performed. Surveys of the workplace, clinical observations and examinations of the patients were conducted. Polyacrylate, consisting of nanoparticles, was confirmed in the workplace. Pathological examinations of patients’ lung tissue displayed nonspecific pulmonary inflammation, pulmonary fibrosis and foreign-body granulomas of pleura. Using transmission electron microscopy, nanoparticles were observed to lodge in the cytoplasm and caryoplasm of pulmonary epithelial and mesothelial cells, but are also located in the chest fluid. These cases arouse concern that long-term exposure to some nanoparticles without protective measures may be related to serious damage to human lungs.“3

To date Animal studies and in vitro experiments show that nanoparticles can result in lung damage and other toxicity in animals, but no reports on the clinical toxicity in humans due to nanoparticles prior to the Beijing study had been made.

The Beijing Chaoyang Hospital study has now conclusively confirmed that nanoparticles cause lung damage and other toxicity in humans as well. At this point in time, when two of the approved vaccines planned to be mass distributed in Germany and elsewhere contain nanoparticles, failure of the relevant responsible public health and epidemiology officials to order an immediate emergency freeze on distribution of any vaccine containing nanoparticles can only be considered tantamount to criminal negligence. Hopefully the responsible authorities will react in time to avert a possible human health catastrophe orders of magnitude worse than the worst case of Swine Flu reported to date.

F. William Engdahl is author of Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order. He may be reached via his website, www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net

Notes: 

1 EPFL, Bioengineering researchers from the EPFL in Lausanne  Switzerland  have developed and patented a nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines accessed in www.azonano.com/nanotechnology%20news.asp?catid=13.

2  Song Y, Li X, Du X, Exposure to nanoparticles is related to pleural effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma, European Respiratory Journal, 9/2009, 34(3): 559-567.
3 Ibid. 

 

Advertisements

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. You have excellent informations here, thank you! Is “Claudia” somewhere behind these texts?

    So you have any evidence of the fact that Europe have nanotechnology vaccination for swineflu. It is so important. Information is top secret and EU laws are protecting those criminal acts.

    So, can you help us? We are insisting information from our goverment right now, wheather Pandemrix-vaccination contains nanotechnology. Probablywe won’t get it…

    Mirjaleena Isoaho ramhie@gmail.fi

    I’m going to use english later in my blog (soon)!

    Mirjaleena Isoaho

    November 29, 2009 at 2:01 am

  2. Nice to meet you, Mirjaleena! I find much useful health related information (especially about Europe) at The Institute of Science in Society http://www.i-sis.org.uk/index.php They are in London.

    There is alot of info about Pandemrix on the web too- at least in English. There is more than enough to be concerned about. One list of ingredients I found at: http://forum.expatica.com/index.php?showtopic=114912

    I believe both the cell-line process (not yet used for US flu vaccines) and nanotechnology are serious concerns, have not been sufficiently tested, and the public just doesn’t have any information to make an informed choice.

    I tried the Google translator to read about you- you are a doctor? I had a good science education, but now work as a bookkeeper and live in Hawaii.

    Claudia

    laudyms

    November 29, 2009 at 9:03 am

  3. Nice article. I thought to let you know that you website wasn’tt getting displayed properly on msie-mobile mobile web browser on my pda.

    Have a good time…sorry for typos

    Andrea

    November 30, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    • thanks for the heads-up

      laudyms

      November 30, 2009 at 5:31 pm

  4. Thank you Claudia answering me. Could you send email @gmail.com so that we could continue discussing better. Yes, I’m general practitioner. It’s grazy that still there are so very few doctors who realize this nano matter… I feel lonely : D
    But luckyly many people listen to me and they have been very helpful looking more and more information. It is a shame this lack of interest of doctors!

    Mirjaleena Isoaho

    December 21, 2009 at 9:33 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: